The Strategic Imperative
The global cloud infrastructure market is dominated by US corporations subject to US law and executive action:
| Provider | Market Share | Jurisdiction | Subject to US Law |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services (AWS) | 31% | USA | Yes |
| Microsoft Azure | 20% | USA | Yes |
| Google Cloud Platform | 12% | USA | Yes |
| Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) | 3% | USA | Yes |
| Alibaba Cloud | 4% | China | No (PRC law) |
| Other (incl. IBM, Salesforce, Tencent, regional providers) | 30% | Various | Mostly US |
Source: Synergy Research Group, Q3 2024. Note: The "Other 30%" includes predominantly US companies (IBM Cloud, Salesforce), Chinese providers serving domestic market (Tencent, Huawei), and a small fraction of genuinely sovereign-friendly providers.
The core problem: 66% of global cloud infrastructure is controlled by four US corporations (AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI). Most of the remaining market is either other US companies or Chinese providers unsuitable for Western government use. Genuinely sovereign European, Canadian, or Australian providers hold negligible global market share.
Global Cloud Infrastructure Market Share
Framework Documentation
Partner Jurisdictions
Each jurisdiction retains full sovereignty over its infrastructure, data, and decision-making. The common architecture framework enables cooperative coordination without supranational control.
This is a matter of national security, democratic resilience, and sovereign survival.
Senior government leadership across multiple jurisdictions now have access to the complete strategic case, technical architecture, business justification, and implementation roadmap needed to authorize and execute sovereign cloud migration.
Read the Executive Summary