Starting Point Assessment
Where each jurisdiction stands today: current dependencies, existing capabilities, and the baseline from which migration begins.
1. Current State Summary
Dependency Matrix by Jurisdiction
| Dependency Area | UK | EU | Canada | Australia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop OS | 95%+ Windows | 90%+ Windows | 95%+ Windows | 95%+ Windows |
| Office Suite | 95%+ M365 | 80%+ M365/Google | 90%+ M365 | 90%+ M365 |
| Cloud IaaS | 85%+ US | 80%+ US | 90%+ US | 85%+ US |
| Email/Collaboration | M365 dominant | Mixed | M365 dominant | M365 dominant |
| Identity (Directory) | Azure AD/Entra | Mixed | Azure AD | Azure AD |
| Sovereign Alternatives | Limited | Available | Limited | Emerging |
2. What We Already Have
Despite deep US dependency, each jurisdiction has existing capabilities and initiatives that provide a foundation for sovereign migration:
United Kingdom
| Crown Hosting | Government datacenter partnership with Ark Data Centres; physical sovereign capability exists |
| G-Cloud Framework | Procurement framework includes EU providers (OVHcloud, IONOS); mechanism exists |
| NCSC Guidance | Cloud Security Principles provide security framework |
| GOV.UK Platform | GDS shared services (Notify, Pay) could be migrated as unit |
| Open Source Experience | GDS has significant open source expertise; GOV.UK runs on open platforms |
European Union
| European Providers | OVHcloud, Hetzner, Scaleway, IONOS, T-Systems—mature hyperscale alternatives available |
| SecNumCloud (FR) | French certification framework already excludes US providers |
| BSI C5 (DE) | German cloud security certification available for mutual recognition |
| Gaia-X | European federated data infrastructure initiative provides standards framework |
| Member State Initiatives | Italy PSN, Germany Bundescloud, France Cloud de Confiance—active programmes |
| Schrems II Legal Basis | ECJ ruling provides legal foundation for US cloud restrictions |
Canada
| SSC Infrastructure | Shared Services Canada operates government datacenters; expansion possible |
| Canadian Telecoms | Bell, Telus, Rogers have datacenter operations; potential sovereign partners |
| OVHcloud Canada | European provider with Canadian presence; available now |
| CSE/CCCS Expertise | Canadian cyber security expertise for security framework |
| Open Source Culture | Government of Canada has open source policy; foundation for tooling adoption |
Australia
| Australian Providers | AUCloud, Vault Cloud, Sliced Tech—PROTECTED certified sovereign options exist |
| Australian Datacenters | NEXTDC, Macquarie—Australian-owned datacenter operators |
| Hosting Certification | DTA Hosting Certification Framework provides security baseline |
| ASD/ACSC | Essential Eight and ISM provide security framework |
| cloud.gov.au | DTA platform-as-a-service; could be migrated to sovereign infrastructure |
3. What We Need to Build
Gaps that must be filled to enable sovereign migration:
| Gap | Current State | Required State | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | No international coordination mechanism | Functioning SCAB and TSC | Establish through diplomatic channels |
| Common Standards | Each jurisdiction has own standards | Interoperable standards with mutual recognition | Working groups to harmonise |
| Supplier Capacity | Limited outside EU | Sufficient capacity in all jurisdictions | EU provider expansion + local development |
| Migration Tooling | Ad-hoc, vendor-specific | Common open-source toolkit | Joint development via WG-Migration |
| Skills | Concentrated in US tech | Distributed across sovereign stack | Training programmes, secondments |
| Political Mandate | Limited awareness at senior levels | Cabinet/ministerial commitment | Briefings, this documentation |
4. Entry Points: Where to Start
Based on current state assessment, recommended entry points for each jurisdiction:
Immediate Actions (All Jurisdictions)
-
Data Backup Initiative
Copy all critical data to sovereign storage. Does not require migration—just backup. Can begin this week. -
Encryption Key Export
Copy customer-managed keys to sovereign vault (OpenBao on EU infrastructure). Ensures data remains accessible if US access revoked. -
Dependency Inventory
Complete audit of US cloud accounts, services, and spend. Foundation for all planning. -
European Provider Evaluation
Trial accounts with OVHcloud, Hetzner, Scaleway. Hands-on experience informs planning.
First Migration Candidates (By Jurisdiction)
| Jurisdiction | Recommended First Migration | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| UK | GDS shared services (Notify, Pay) to Crown Hosting + European IaaS | High visibility, GDS has open source skills, manageable scope |
| EU | European Commission internal collaboration tools | Demonstrates EU eating own cooking, SecNumCloud providers ready |
| Canada | StatsCan data platforms to SSC + OVHcloud Canada | High sensitivity data, clear sovereignty case, manageable scale |
| Australia | DTA internal tools to AUCloud | DTA should lead by example, Australian provider ready |
Quick Win: Email & Collaboration
Across all jurisdictions, email and collaboration tools represent the fastest path to demonstrable progress. Alternatives (Nextcloud, Open-Xchange, Collabora) are mature. Denmark has proven this works. Migration can begin immediately with pilot departments.
5. Readiness Assessment Framework
Each jurisdiction should assess readiness across these dimensions:
| Dimension | Questions | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Political | Is there ministerial/Cabinet awareness? Is sovereignty on the agenda? | Briefing uptake, policy statements |
| Legal | Is there legal basis for sovereign cloud requirements? Procurement flexibility? | Legal opinions, procurement rules review |
| Technical | Do we have skills for sovereign stack? Pilot capability? | Skills audit, pilot project readiness |
| Supplier | Are sovereign providers available? On frameworks? | Framework listings, capability assessments |
| Financial | Is funding available? Business case accepted? | Budget allocation, Treasury approval |
| Organisational | Is there programme team? Governance structure? | Team establishment, governance charter |
6. Starting Point Checklist
Day 1 Readiness Checklist
Before formal programme launch, confirm:
7. Next Steps from Starting Point
Week 1-2: Foundation
- Complete dependency inventory
- Begin critical data backup
- Set up sovereign collaboration tools for programme team
- Brief senior sponsor
Week 3-4: Evaluation
- European provider hands-on evaluation
- First migration candidate deep-dive
- Skills gap assessment
- Cross-jurisdiction contact
Month 2: Planning
- Draft pilot migration plan
- Initial budget estimate
- Governance structure proposal
- Procurement pathway identified
Month 3: Approval
- Seek pilot approval
- Establish programme team
- Engage with international partners
- Begin pilot execution
The Starting Point is Now
The first step is the hardest—but the path is clear.